09 October 2024 Sean Mosby 930 Case Updates Chifley Holdings Ltd (BVI) v The Commissioners For HMRC [2024] UKUT 301 (LC) bySean Mosby Summary The judge found that it was without justification and entirely unecessary for an expert to question the opposing expert's professionalism and motives in selecting evidence, noting that this approach was unhelpful for the tribunal. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgement Share Print Tags 06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing14. Changing your opinion13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Giving Oral Evidence16. Criticism and Complaints10. Records Assessments and Site VisitsSurveyorsValuation Related articles An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to the court The diagnosis hang-up and cardiological manifestations of PTSD Setting The Goal Posts in Expert Determination Cases For “Manifest Error” Exceptions Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness Switch article Fact finding by experts Previous Article Professor Keith Rix and Alison Somek awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.