The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Limited [2025] EWHC 2486... The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Limited [2025] EWHC 2486...

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Limited [2025] EWHC 2486...

The defendant was contracted, during the Covid lockdowns, to source and supply sterile gowns, which the claimant subsequently asserted were not...
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and... Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

The Forensic Science Regulator has published new Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication. The Guidance applies to...
Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement

Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement

We have just completed the regular review of our Standard Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement. The purpose of the Terms and Conditions is...
New EWI Guidance on Responding to Written Questions New EWI Guidance on Responding to Written Questions

New EWI Guidance on Responding to Written Questions

We have just published our new Guide on Responding to Written Questions. Informed by the knowledge and experience of the EWI Editorial and...
Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report

Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report

The Court excluded consideration of the expert testimony of an expert on the dangers of AI and misinformation, after he submitted an expert...
Yodel Delivery Network Limited v Jacob Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 1435 (Ch) Yodel Delivery Network Limited v Jacob Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 1435 (Ch)

Yodel Delivery Network Limited v Jacob Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 1435 (Ch)

The two handwriting experts in this case were given completely different samples of comparator signatures and did not undertake the same task. The...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025 Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Join us for the last podcast of 2025! With some festive cheer, we review 2025, with the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...
Podcast Episode 19: Transparency and Open Justice Podcast Episode 19: Transparency and Open Justice

Podcast Episode 19: Transparency and Open Justice

In this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we explore recent developments in Transparency and Open Justice. You can also catch our...
A Day in the Life of a Paramedical Skin Camouflage Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Paramedical Skin Camouflage Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Paramedical Skin Camouflage Expert Witness

Vanessa Jane Davies is the founder of Skin Camouflage Services, an independent expert practice offering paramedical skin camouflage, non-invasive scar...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome
Keith Rix 780

Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

This is an important judgment for obstetricians as it shows in precise detail how the court, relying on not just the experts’ evidence but a critical analysis of the literature on which they relied, decided whether the claimant would have avoided developing HELLP had she been advised to take 75 mg aspirin at 12 (or 14) weeks instead of at 23. Twelve publications were put under the microscope and considered also in the light of research concerning the relative value of aggregate data and individual participant data.

Although the issue in this case was the prevention of HELLP, it may be an important judgment to consider in pre-eclampsia cases.

Learning points:

General

  • It is important to investigate the full history of symptoms

  • It can be misleading to quote only investigation results that support an opinion and not to quote results that undermine the opinion.

  • An inability to explain why some results have been quoted and others ignored can call an expert’s credibility into question.

  • Where an expert’s opinion is inconsistent with the observations and conclusions of a range of healthcare professionals, and without a convincing explanation, this can affect the expert’s credibility and the weight given to their opinion.

  • More than symptoms are needed to make a diagnosis.

  • Where an expert is passionate about their opinion, this may be evidence of their sincerity but combined with being unwilling to recognise and balance countervailing evidence and unwillingness save in very limited respects to make any concessions, and show the ‘flexibility of mind’ referred to in Loveday v Renton, along with, in this case, proneness to making sweeping statements, their objectivity may be in question.

  • When criticising the methodology of a study upon which another expert relies, consider whether the same point could be made about other studies, including those upon which you rely.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.