Regal BA Limited v Jun Zhang [2026] EWHC 1446 (Ch) Regal BA Limited v Jun Zhang [2026] EWHC 1446 (Ch)

Regal BA Limited v Jun Zhang [2026] EWHC 1446 (Ch)

The claimant sought damages amounting to the difference between the £16.9 million contract sale price from a failed house sale and the sum ultimately...
Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me -  Tony Saggers Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me - Tony Saggers

Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me - Tony Saggers

In this month's in 'A case that changed me' we are talking with Tony Saggers who is a Threat, Risk and Harm consultant, with 30 years of...
Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service  Board:... Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board:...

Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board:...

The decision in O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board [2025] CSOH 17 provides important guidance on the legal and professional standards...
Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal

Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal

At a recent Frontier Economics Litigation event, the President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, The Honourable Mrs Justice Bacon, warned that...
EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports

EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports

“If an Expert, a lawyer, an accountant, an engineer, a doctor produce inaccurate or unreliable opinions or use hallucinatory references, they are...
Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion

Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion

The Claimant suffered serious injuries in a road traffic accident after the Defendant, who was driving out of a side road, collided with the...
A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

Dr Frances Cranfield is a GP, Assistant Coroner, and a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute. With three decades of experience spanning...
New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness

New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness

The EWI has just published its new guide to Becoming and Expert Witness. Written by EWI Member Paul Beckett, the guide is aimed at those who are...
Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and...
Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we preview the EWI  Annual Conference which will be held virtually on 19 June 2026. We look at some of...
A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

We speak to David Deacon, a chartered surveyor who has spent his career in residential property. He founded Housing Disrepair Surveys, leading a team...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome
Keith Rix 1575

Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome

by Keith Rix

 

Commentary

This is an important judgment for obstetricians as it shows in precise detail how the court, relying on not just the experts’ evidence but a critical analysis of the literature on which they relied, decided whether the claimant would have avoided developing HELLP had she been advised to take 75 mg aspirin at 12 (or 14) weeks instead of at 23. Twelve publications were put under the microscope and considered also in the light of research concerning the relative value of aggregate data and individual participant data.

Although the issue in this case was the prevention of HELLP, it may be an important judgment to consider in pre-eclampsia cases.

Learning points:

General

  • It is important to investigate the full history of symptoms

  • It can be misleading to quote only investigation results that support an opinion and not to quote results that undermine the opinion.

  • An inability to explain why some results have been quoted and others ignored can call an expert’s credibility into question.

  • Where an expert’s opinion is inconsistent with the observations and conclusions of a range of healthcare professionals, and without a convincing explanation, this can affect the expert’s credibility and the weight given to their opinion.

  • More than symptoms are needed to make a diagnosis.

  • Where an expert is passionate about their opinion, this may be evidence of their sincerity but combined with being unwilling to recognise and balance countervailing evidence and unwillingness save in very limited respects to make any concessions, and show the ‘flexibility of mind’ referred to in Loveday v Renton, along with, in this case, proneness to making sweeping statements, their objectivity may be in question.

  • When criticising the methodology of a study upon which another expert relies, consider whether the same point could be made about other studies, including those upon which you rely.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.