Aaron Haley v Newcold Ltd [2025] EWCC 57 Aaron Haley v Newcold Ltd [2025] EWCC 57

Aaron Haley v Newcold Ltd [2025] EWCC 57

The Claimant alleged that an accident five years earlier was the cause of the amputation of his lower leg. The judge criticised the Claimant’s...
Fixed Recoverable Costs Interim Implementation Stocktake Fixed Recoverable Costs Interim Implementation Stocktake

Fixed Recoverable Costs Interim Implementation Stocktake

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is undertaking a consultation regarding the effectiveness of the extension of Fixed Recoverable Costs (FRC),...
Draft report retains litigation privilege (at least for now) Draft report retains litigation privilege (at least for now)

Draft report retains litigation privilege (at least for now)

It is not easy to appreciate the significance of this judgment for experts in general without reading the summary so the ‘Commentary’ is...
Podcast Episode 18: Pro Bono Expert Evidence Podcast Episode 18: Pro Bono Expert Evidence

Podcast Episode 18: Pro Bono Expert Evidence

Today is the start of the 24th UK Pro Bono Week. In this extra edition of the Expert Matters Podcast we discuss the EWI's recent Partnership with...
Sidney Conway v Yeovil District Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2025] EWHC 2488... Sidney Conway v Yeovil District Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2025] EWHC 2488...

Sidney Conway v Yeovil District Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2025] EWHC 2488...

The Claimant’s father and litigation friend alleged that the medical practitioners treating his son were negligent in not promptly carrying out...
Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work

Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work

One of the key roles of the Expert Witness Institute (‘EWI’) is to ensure that policy, rule and regulatory changes are informed by the...
Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026 Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026

From 1 January 2026, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee will be piloting access to public domain documents in the Commercial Court and London Circuit...
A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

Julie Andrews is a consultant Speech and Language Therapist providing assessments for Special Educational Need (SEND) tribunals and writing...
Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

October 10th is World Mental Health Day and in this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at the issue of wellbeing and...
A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

Dr Richard Taylor is an Expert in the identification, verification and valuation of diamonds, gemstones, jewellery, watches, silver and antiques. He...
Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

In the 16th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and Sean, discuss CV Writing. We look at the purpose of expert CVs, the rules and...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome
Keith Rix 507

Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

This is an important judgment for obstetricians as it shows in precise detail how the court, relying on not just the experts’ evidence but a critical analysis of the literature on which they relied, decided whether the claimant would have avoided developing HELLP had she been advised to take 75 mg aspirin at 12 (or 14) weeks instead of at 23. Twelve publications were put under the microscope and considered also in the light of research concerning the relative value of aggregate data and individual participant data.

Although the issue in this case was the prevention of HELLP, it may be an important judgment to consider in pre-eclampsia cases.

Learning points:

General

  • It is important to investigate the full history of symptoms

  • It can be misleading to quote only investigation results that support an opinion and not to quote results that undermine the opinion.

  • An inability to explain why some results have been quoted and others ignored can call an expert’s credibility into question.

  • Where an expert’s opinion is inconsistent with the observations and conclusions of a range of healthcare professionals, and without a convincing explanation, this can affect the expert’s credibility and the weight given to their opinion.

  • More than symptoms are needed to make a diagnosis.

  • Where an expert is passionate about their opinion, this may be evidence of their sincerity but combined with being unwilling to recognise and balance countervailing evidence and unwillingness save in very limited respects to make any concessions, and show the ‘flexibility of mind’ referred to in Loveday v Renton, along with, in this case, proneness to making sweeping statements, their objectivity may be in question.

  • When criticising the methodology of a study upon which another expert relies, consider whether the same point could be made about other studies, including those upon which you rely.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.