Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Have your say in this important research and be in with a chance of winning £200 in vouchers of your choice.
Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch) Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)

Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)

The case focussed on the validity of a will and codicil made by a wealthy lady, Mrs MacDougall, as well as a number of substantial gifts and...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

An issue for the court to determine, not a planning consultant.
Simon Berney-Edwards 4009

An issue for the court to determine, not a planning consultant.

bySimon Berney-Edwards

A recent case in Northern Ireland’s High Court has seen lawyers criticised for the inclusion of non-compliant evidence. At the heart of this was an expert witness who stated that the planning permission for a GAA stadium in Casement Park, Belfast, was “unlawful”.

 

Mr Justice Michael Humphreys made the remarks after rejecting several grounds of challenge. He noted that this was an issue which was “demonstrably for the court to determine, not a planning consultant”. This language demonstrated a “complete lack of understanding of the role of an expert witness in our legal system”.

 

The court commented: “Solicitors and counsel owe obligations to the court to ensure the proper administration of justice and affidavits of this nature should never have been filed.”

 

Simon Berney-Edwards, EWI Chief Executive Officer, said “This is another timely reminder that the Expert’s role is to provide their expert opinion based on the facts. They are not permitted to usurp the role of the court in deciding disputed facts and ultimate issues.”

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.