Civil Justice Council Consultation on Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents Civil Justice Council Consultation on Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents

Civil Justice Council Consultation on Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents

The Civil Justice Council (‘CJC’) has published an Interim Report and Consultation on the Use of AI for preparing court documents. The...
Moulding -v- BSA Group (SW) Ltd & others, HHJ Berkley, County Court at Bristol 16th... Moulding -v- BSA Group (SW) Ltd & others, HHJ Berkley, County Court at Bristol 16th...

Moulding -v- BSA Group (SW) Ltd & others, HHJ Berkley, County Court at Bristol 16th...

The claimants, who own a property adjoining with the properties of the defendants, complained that the defendants engaged in various acts of trespass...
Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm) McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm)

McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm)

The claimant alleged that the second defendant, a Spanish racing driver, had repudiated a binding agreement under which he was contracted to drive for...
Getting paid in Scotland Getting paid in Scotland

Getting paid in Scotland

This case illustrates the factors taken into account in Scotland in deciding whether to grant an application for certification of an expert which is...
Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2 Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2

Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2

The Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, chaired by Sir Brian Leveson, has just published Part 2 of the Review with 135 recommendations,...
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and... Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

The Forensic Science Regulator has published new Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication. The Guidance applies to...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025 Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Join us for the last podcast of 2025! With some festive cheer, we review 2025, with the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026
Simon Berney-Edwards 1544

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026

bySimon Berney-Edwards

Background

From 1 January 2026, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (‘Committee’) will be piloting access to public domain documents in a number of commercial courts. The Pilot is part of a process implementing the Supreme Court decision in Cape v Dring and the recently published Key Objectives of the Transparency and Open Justice Board.  The Pilot will be implemented under CPR rule 51.2 and the practice direction can be found as part of the 191st Practice Direction. The Committee has also issued a Guidance Note

 

The Pilot

The Pilot will operate:

  • From 1 January 2026 to 31st December 2027,
  • In the Commercial Court and London Circuit Commercial Court of the King’s Bench Division and the Financial List (Commercial Court and Chancery Division) (‘Pilot Courts’).

Unless the court makes an order restricting access to the document, expert reports and a range of other documents must be made publicly available once they have been used or referred to at a hearing in public.

 

Advice for expert witnesses

We know that many members are concerned with the possible implications for expert witnesses, including the safety of expert witnesses. The EWI will continue to engage with the Committee, the wider Judiciary and policymakers on our concerns.

Our initial advice for expert witnesses is:

  • Especially if you act in cases in the Pilot Courts, ensure you have read the Pilot Practice Direction and the Guidance.
  • Be aware that in future the position across civil courts is likely to be that your expert report will have to be made publicly available once it has been used or referred to at a hearing in public.
  • Have a discussion with your instructing party about when they intend to first use or refer to your expert report. If you have any concerns about publication, ask them to inform you once the requirement to make the report publicly available has been triggered.
  • Have a discussion with your instructing party about how they would like you to deal with any confidential information in your report. 
  • Do not include your own personal information, other than as required by the applicable procedural rules, in your expert report or joint statement. For example, do not include your contact details (telephone number, email or physical address) in these documents.
  • Be aware that blanket claims of confidentiality may not be accepted by the Court.  
  • If you work in a field where you may be subject to media attention or harassment by non-parties because of the nature or contents of your expert report, you may wish to review the personal information you include on social media and other publicly available profiles. 
  • The Committee intends to review the Pilot after 6 months of operation. We would appreciate any details of your experiences with the Pilot to inform our engagement with the Committee’s review.
  • You can also contact the member helpline with any specific problems you encounter.

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.