Pacemaker PTSD? Pacemaker PTSD?

Pacemaker PTSD?

This is primarily a case for cardiologists, cardiac nurses and anaesthetists with a learning point for psychiatric experts. Viewed from outside the...
Advising as to the applicable law Advising as to the applicable law

Advising as to the applicable law

The detail of this judgment is for experts who conduct capacity assessments. Two points arise of more general interest. First, the expert, who had...
Evidentiary reliability and the meaning of words Evidentiary reliability and the meaning of words

Evidentiary reliability and the meaning of words

This case has a number of important features of general interest. It illustrates the importance of assessing the reliability of a subject’s...
Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

In the 11th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at how AI is being used by Expert Witnesses. We discuss general developments related...
EWI publishes new Guidance on Expert Discussions and Joint Statements EWI publishes new Guidance on Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

EWI publishes new Guidance on Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

We have just refreshed our guidance on ‘Expert Discussions and Joint Statements' in the EWI Knowledge Hub...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

A demonstrably incapable and incompetent witness who was not fit to have been put forward as an expert witness
Keith Rix 608

A demonstrably incapable and incompetent witness who was not fit to have been put forward as an expert witness

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

Judgment in this case was given by Master Evan Bell, a previous Grange Conference speaker, and the author of ‘Judicial assessment of expert evidence’ in the Judicial Studies Institute Journal, 2: 55-96, 2010 (https://ie.vlex.com/vid/judicial-assessment-of-expert-847477374 ) which might usefully be read with this case summary. Master Bell’s 13-point framework, which he used when considering the expert evidence, is also a useful framework for experts to use when reflecting on their expert witness practice or that of another expert in a case-based discussion or peer review. His framework is also a useful one for expert witness training.

For surveyor experts, the case illustrates some very basic errors and it may therefore also be a useful case for expert surveyor witness training.   

Learning points:
  •   Beware over-reliance on the subject’s account to the exclusion of documentary evidence.

  •    An expert report is only as good as the assumptions on which it is based.

  •    Where one expert’s methodology is more sound than another’s, that expert’s opinion may be accorded more weight.

  •     It is rare for expert speculation to assist.  

  •     Inspection or examination must be thorough

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.