01 March 2020 Simon Berney-Edwards 2990 Case Updates A Clinical Commissioning Group v AF [2020] EWCOP 16, 2020 WL 01494079 by Simon Berney-Edwards Nature of case: The first question to be decided was whether AF had the capacity to decide whether to continue to receive CANH via a PEG tube inserted into his stomach. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Capacity casesBest interest10. Records Assessments and Site Visits11. Report Writing Related articles Dermot Speight & Ors (as trustees of the Thornaby Angling Association) v Robert James Pickersgill [2026] EWCC 48 Be cautious when accepting instructions from a Litigant in Person A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness Various Claimants v Mercedes-Benz Group and Others [2026] EWHC 1753 (KB) Downes v Ostrowicka 118DC085 Switch article FXF v Ampleforth Abbey Trustees [2020] EWHC 791 (QB), 2020 WL 01663316 Previous Article Leafrealm Land Limited v The City of Edinburgh Council [2020] CSOH 34, 2020 WL 01290090 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.