01 March 2020 Simon Berney-Edwards 2668 Case Updates A Clinical Commissioning Group v AF [2020] EWCOP 16, 2020 WL 01494079 by Simon Berney-Edwards Nature of case: The first question to be decided was whether AF had the capacity to decide whether to continue to receive CANH via a PEG tube inserted into his stomach. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Capacity casesBest interest10. Records Assessments and Site Visits11. Report Writing Related articles Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board: Independence, Expertise and the Boundaries of Expert Opinion in Remote Clinical Triage Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness Switch article FXF v Ampleforth Abbey Trustees [2020] EWHC 791 (QB), 2020 WL 01663316 Previous Article Leafrealm Land Limited v The City of Edinburgh Council [2020] CSOH 34, 2020 WL 01290090 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.