The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee has published a new consolidation of the Criminal Procedure Rules and an accompanying guide. The new Rules will...
Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and... Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and...

Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and...

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee ('Committee') is consulting on proposed amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules Part 77 and the Practice...
Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk

Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk

Although this is an orthopaedic case and in which given its preliminary nature the expert evidence was not tested, it is helpful for experts in...
Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC... Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC...

Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC...

The barrister for the Claimant was unable to explain to the court's satisfaction why she had cited several non-existent cases in pleadings. The...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...
A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

Ryan Shields is a digital forensics expert who has worked in the police and private sector. Here, he explains why he is passionate about using his...
Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

In the 12th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss Expert Discussions and Joint Statements. Joint Statements are critical documents in any...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical  Reporting Process for Road  Traffic Accident Claims
Sean Mosby 996

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims

bySean Mosby

 

Government response to 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims' consultation

The Government has published its response to the consultation it ran from 18 July to 10 October 2023 on 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic Accident Claims’. The consultation sought comments from interested stakeholders on several issues of relevance to those who commission and/or provide medical reports used in support of RTA-related personal injury claims valued up to £5,000. The EWI responded to the consultation. 

The report setting out the government response summarises the responses received, along with information on the decisions taken and the next steps in relation to implementing outcomes related to the policy proposals consulted upon.

The Government has decided to move forward with the following changes:

Part 1: Changes to MedCo Qualifying Criteria

The Minsitry of Justice ('MoJ') will work with MedCo to update the qualifying criteria for Medical Reporting Organisations ('MROs'), including reducing the required report capacity for tier 1 MROs from 40,000 to 28,000 per year, and reducing the number of active experts from 225 to 175. MoJ will retain the requirement for tier 1 MROs to have active experts in 80% of regions in England & Wales.

Part 2: Amended DME Rules

MoJ will work with MedCo to implement the proposed changes to the Direct Medical Expert ('DME') rules and will slightly modify the wording around the role of the audit committee.

Part 3: Review of MedCo ‘Offer’

MoJ will work with MedCo to change the ‘offer’ for represented claimants. They will be offered two tier 1 MROs, six tier 2 MROs and seven DMEs. Unrepresented claimants will continue to be offered two tier 1 MROs, two tier 2 MROs and five DMEs.

Part 4: Use of Administration Agencies by Direct Medical Experts

MoJ will work with MedCo to develop a range of Qualifying Criteria which fairly encompass the support activities of different types of Administration Agencies before changes are made to the necessary secondary legislation.

Part 5: Review of Fixed Cost Medical Report

MoJ will increase the fixed cost medical report levels as outlined in the report and will consult on the required rule changes and new figures before implementation.

Part 6: Official Injury Claim: Medical report process

MoJ will work with MedCo to review and refine the MedCo Accreditation process and training, in line with stakeholder feedback. This is aimed at improving compliance with Parts 7.8 of the RTA PAP and 7.9 of the Small Claims PAP and improving the quality of MedCo medical reports generally.

MoJ will amend the RTA Small Claims PAP and accompanying Practice Direction 27B to ensure represented claimants using the OIC system must receive the defendant’s response on liability before instructing a medical expert. This is to ensure the instructions to the medical expert are complete and improve the quality of medical reports. MoJ will also work with stakeholders to explore the development of options for aligning the processes for obtaining medical reports, so that represented and unrepresented claimants follow the same medical reporting journey.

Government Engagement on Further Revisions to Fixed Cost Medical Reports

As noted above in Part 5, Government is engaging with stakeholders on further revisions to the fixed cost medical reports. After considering the responses on this issue, the Government decided to increase the FCMR using SPPI as the inflationary measure. They are seeking additional input from stakeholders regarding a further revision of the FCMRs to account for the delay between the closure of the consultation and the government response. The proposed revised figures are set out in Table 3 of the stakeholder engagement document which is attached below. The Government is seeking a response to two survey questions by 31 January 2025. 

Survey Questions

The Government previously consulted on revisions to the FCMR regime included at Part 45.19 of the CPR and agreed to increase them using the SPPI inflationary measure. However, to account for delays in publishing the outcomes of this consultation, a further revision to the previously proposed figures is now proposed.

1. Please provide any views on this proposal to set FCMRs at the newly revised values (a 25.4% increase on current figures, as shown in Table 3) as opposed to the values previously proposed in the 2023 consultation (a 18.3% increase on current figures, as shown in Table 2). Please provide an explanation of your reasoning and any evidence in support of your position as it relates to this proposal.

2. If you disagree with the proposal included in this document, please provide details of any alternative proposal you may have along with an explanation of your reasoning and any evidence in support of your position as it relates to this proposal.

The EWI will be responding to the stakeholder engagement. If you would like to provide input into the EWI's response please contact us at policy@ewi.org.uk by 24 January 2025. 

Documents to download

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.