Instructed Late, Judged Early: What the Ciarb 2026 report on expert witnesses asks of... Instructed Late, Judged Early: What the Ciarb 2026 report on expert witnesses asks of...

Instructed Late, Judged Early: What the Ciarb 2026 report on expert witnesses asks of...

In July 2026, Ciarb published its Report on Party-Appointed Expert Witnesses in International Arbitration (the Ciarb Report), based on 419 survey...
A medical report to which the court gave little weight A medical report to which the court gave little weight

A medical report to which the court gave little weight

This is yet another case in which a medical report has been given little weight in immigration and asylum proceedings. Begum v Secretary of State for...
DLP Ltd v Coram UK Holding Ltd [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC) (25 September 2026) DLP Ltd v Coram UK Holding Ltd [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC) (25 September 2026)

DLP Ltd v Coram UK Holding Ltd [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC) (25 September 2026)

The Claimant asserted that the Defendant had infringed their patent for an electric shower-waster pump and control unit. The trial related to...
EWI awards three Honorary Fellowships EWI awards three Honorary Fellowships

EWI awards three Honorary Fellowships

David Cowan, Leam Craig. and Kathryn Newns have been recognised for their contribution to the Expert Witness community.  
Podcast Episode 31: 30 years of Expert Evidence Podcast Episode 31: 30 years of Expert Evidence

Podcast Episode 31: 30 years of Expert Evidence

This month we have a special episode to celebrate 30 years since the Expert Witness Institute was launched on 8 November 2026. We are going to look...
Information publicly available on the internet - 'Digital Open Source Information' Information publicly available on the internet - 'Digital Open Source Information'

Information publicly available on the internet - 'Digital Open Source Information'

Although this is an immigration and asylum case, in which country experts often provide evidence from a variety of sources about conditions in the...
A Day in the Life of an Oil and Commodities Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Oil and Commodities Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Oil and Commodities Expert Witness

Catherine Jago is an oil and commodities Expert Witness with nearly four decades of experience in the field. She started her career at BP before...
The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink? The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink?

The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink?

In this article, Rose Wilson and Mariya Rankin from Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP, and Bhavina Vasishta from Rimkus consider whether...
Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce

Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkiss, discuss the EWI's project to map the Expert Witness...
A Day in the Life of an Occupational Therapy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Occupational Therapy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Occupational Therapy Expert Witness

Clare Cole is an Occupational Therapist with nearly 17 years of clinical experience, who now works as an Expert Witness in the medico-legal field....
A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness

Kathryn Rowe is an Expert Witness and Physiotherapist with over 17 years of clinical experience in neurological, spinal and orthopaedic...
Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person

Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss acting for litigants in person. The accessibility of tools like generative AI is making...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings
Sean Mosby 3744

Call for evidence: Use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings

by Sean Mosby

 

The Ministry of Justice has published a call for evidence on the use of evidence generated by software in criminal proceedings.

The call for evidence is to help the Ministry better understand how the current presumption concerning the admissibility of computer evidence is working in practice, and whether it is fit for purpose in the modern world. The limitations of this presumption have been highlighted starkly by the Post Office Horizon scandal, which saw hundreds of sub-postmasters wrongly convicted based on evidence which is now known to have been false, due to faults in the Horizon accounting software system. This clearly demonstrated the fallibility of evidence produced by software. 

The Ministry wishes to increase its evidence base and understanding of the ways in which evidence produced by software is handled in criminal proceedings. This includes how this evidence is treated in other jurisdictions, and any challenges or issues with the current position in this country.

Current Common Law Presumption

Since 2000 there has been a common law (rebuttable) presumption that the computer was operating correctly at the material time. The presumption is a rebuttable one, meaning that if it can be shown that the software may not have been functioning correctly, the burden shifts to whoever is seeking to rely on the evidence to prove that it was. 

Proposed scope of any reform to the law

The Ministry is keen that any changes to the current common law presumption are carefully defined to only include that evidence which is generated by software, including Artificial Intelligence and algorithms. It believes that evidence which is merely captured or recorded by a device should be excluded.

Questions

The Ministry is seeking responses to a series of questions set out at the end of the call for evidence.

How to respond

You can respond to the call for evidence by email to computer.evidence@justice.gov.uk by 15 April 2025. The EWI will be submitting a response to the call for evidence. If you would like to provide input into the EWI's response, please contact us at policy@ewi.org.uk by 31 March 2025.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.