Login Join Us
The Post Office Horizon Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness training The Post Office Horizon Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness training

The Post Office Horizon Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness training

Gareth Jenkins gave evidence to the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry from 25 to 28 June on the expert evidence he provided on the Horizon IT system. Mr...
G (A Child: Care Order) (Complex Developmental Needs) (No.2) [2023] EWFC 218 (B) G (A Child: Care Order) (Complex Developmental Needs) (No.2) [2023] EWFC 218 (B)

G (A Child: Care Order) (Complex Developmental Needs) (No.2) [2023] EWFC 218 (B)

An expert must read and engage with any judgments which form part of their instructions. 
Concerns raised about pilot scheme for expert evidence in the Family Courts Concerns raised about pilot scheme for expert evidence in the Family Courts

Concerns raised about pilot scheme for expert evidence in the Family Courts

The pilot project seeks to use a range of highly expert consultants from a range of specialties undertake assessments of children, discuss...
MB v KB [2023] EWHC 3177 (Fam) MB v KB [2023] EWHC 3177 (Fam)

MB v KB [2023] EWHC 3177 (Fam)

An expert report did not address all of the questions posed in the letter of instruction, reformulated other questions, and failed to comply with FPR...
Lendlease Construction (Europe) Ltd v Aecom Ltd (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 2620 (TCC) Lendlease Construction (Europe) Ltd v Aecom Ltd (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 2620 (TCC)

Lendlease Construction (Europe) Ltd v Aecom Ltd (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 2620 (TCC)

An expert is entitled to revise his or her opinion in light of a judge's finding as to what is or is not required in order to comply with...
Expert Evidence and The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Expert Evidence and The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry

Expert Evidence and The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry

The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry is currently holding the public hearings for its phases 5 and 6, which will include scrutiny of the...
A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction

A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction

Efstathios Maliakis is senior electrical engineer with 20 years’ experience, including 10 years supervising the construction of power plants. A...
A Day in the Life of a Japanese Knotweed Expert A Day in the Life of a Japanese Knotweed Expert

A Day in the Life of a Japanese Knotweed Expert

One of the UK’s leading experts in Japanese knotweed, Dr Paul Beckett has been providing Expert Witness services since the early 2000s. He...
A Day in the Life of a Chartered Building Surveyor Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Chartered Building Surveyor Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Chartered Building Surveyor Expert Witness

Rod Appleyard has been practising as an Expert Witness for almost 28 years, specialising in the forensic investigation of fenestration and building...

News

Wiebke Morgan
/ Categories: Helpline Q&A

We are reviewing our document/data retention policy and how long we can or should hold on to client data. What should experts do in this area?

Firstly, in terms of contractual and/or tortious liabilities, the law in relation to limitation is notoriously complex and anyone thinking about how to deal with retention of paperwork should certainly talk to their liability insurers for advice.  Even where the limitation period in relation to a particular contractual or tortious liability is 6 years (which is often quoted as the legally required time), there may be debate about when "time starts to run" and in practical terms the court documents in relation to such a claim do not have to be served on the defendant immediately they are issued at court, so to allow for some leeway, a minimum period of 7 years might be wise, but as mentioned above, it would be best to take specific advice from your insurers.  The situation can become very complex if for example the matter has involved a child, a protected party or a claim for provisional damages.
 
If  we are interpreting your question correctly then you are not asking about keeping documents to satisfy HMRC or to rely on in the event of litigation against your firm, Rather we think  you are asking about the need to keep records in case the matter to which they relate goes to a trial in court and your (your expert's) evidence is needed.  The law of limitation does of course not govern this time period.  
 
The ideal approach in this case would be to: "when the case settles, then your system should automatically delete all info, other the invoice and the actual report."  
 
That approach is, of course, dependent on the solicitor telling you that the case has settled.  
 
The difficulty for you might be to know when a particular case has concluded.  Some cases may well take more than 6 years from the date of instruction to conclude and it is conceivable that some of those cases could go to court and thus you would need to have access to the relevant documents.  The instructing solicitor might well be able to provide copies of many of the relevant documents but the expert/your firm would be expected to have kept any records of their own until the conclusion of the case.
 
You will also have to consider your GDPR position and be aware of not keeping personal data for longer than is necessary.
So on a practical level, you would ideally retain all records until notified that a case has concluded and then for the appropriate period thereafter as describe above in terms of contractual liabilities.  
 
Touching on the point of whether to keep paper or electronic records, we would add that if you elect to keep the records electronically you need to be mindful of security and back up.
 
In summary, as a minimum:
 
1.     From a liability perspective, you should talk to your insurers ;
2.     From an on-going duty to the client perspective, you should talk to the instructing solicitors to clarify their expectations and to agree a policy;

 

There is some helpful advice on this page including an example saying that an organisation can keep limited amounts of data available about previous clients if there is a possibility of a complaint:

 

Principle (e): Storage limitation | ICO

Print
247
Comments are only visible to subscribers.