12 July 2024 Sean Mosby 764 Podcast Podcast Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness training bySean Mosby In Episode 2 of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and Sean discuss the appearance of Gareth Jenkins, former Distinguished Engineer at Fujitsu Services Ltd, at the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry. Mr Jenkins told the Inquiry that he had been unaware of the duties of an Expert Witness until the end of 2020 and had not been offered any training opportunities to support his role in the Post Office's prosecutions of Postmasters. Simon and Sean discuss how Mr Jenkins' evidence highlights the key role of Expert Witness training in the just and efficient operation of the Justice System, before going on to look at some recent judgments where lack of training was a significant problem. The judgments discussed in this episode are: Hamed v. Ministry of Justice (County Court in Cambridge – 7th June 2024) Dusko Knezevic v The Government of the Republic of Montenegro [2024] EWHC 761 (Admin) Jenni Glover & Anor v Fluid Structural Engineers & Technical Designers Limited & Ors [2024] EWHC 1257 (TCC) You can listen to Episode 2 of the Expert Matters Podcast on spotify and apple podcasts. We would also appreciate your feedback including improvements and ideas for content you would like us to include at policy@ewi.org.uk. Did you know you can get CPD hours for listening to our Podcast? Anyone who is a registered user on our website can record their time listening to the Podcast in their CPD Log by visiting their My EWI. Record my CPD More links Link to the Podcast Share Print Tags Post Office Horizon IT InquiryPost Office Scandal05. Rules and Regulations10. Report Writing11. Responding to questions14. Giving Oral Evidence15. Criticism and ComplaintsGareth JenkinsExpert Witness Training Related articles Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024 When expert evidence falls well below the standard of a competent expert witness EWI Refreshes Core Training offering Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives An unsafe conviction with flawed DNA evidence Comments are only visible to subscribers.